相关推荐

• 古交外圍女模特

  傳達學習深入貫徹中央八項規定精神學習教育有關會議和文件精神

  目前，賓夕法尼亞州政府相關機構正在尋找丟失的裝置，並警告稱，如果裝置損壞或處理不當，人們或受到輻射汙染

  長垣外圍模特

  2025-07-11 09:51
• 南安外圍

  Sam Altman(@sama)：important post from joanne: 'some thoughts on human-ai relationships and how we're approaching them at openai it's a long blog post -- tl;dr we build models to serve people first. as more people feel increasingly connected to ai, we’re prioritizing research into how this impacts their emotional well-being. -- Lately, more and more people have been telling us that talking to ChatGPT feels like talking to “someone.” They thank it, confide in it, and some even describe it as “alive.” As AI systems get better at natural conversation and show up in more parts of life, our guess is that these kinds of bonds will deepen. The way we frame and talk about human‑AI relationships now will set a tone. If we're not precise with terms or nuance — in the products we ship or public discussions we contribute to — we risk sending people’s relationship with AI off on the wrong foot. These aren't abstract considerations anymore. They're important to us, and to the broader field, because how we navigate them will meaningfully shape the role AI plays in people's lives. And we've started exploring these questions. This note attempts to snapshot how we’re thinking today about three intertwined questions: why people might attach emotionally to AI, how we approach the question of “AI consciousness”, and how that informs the way we try to shape model behavior. A familiar pattern in a new-ish setting We naturally anthropomorphize objects around us: We name our cars or feel bad for a robot vacuum stuck under furniture. My mom and I waved bye to a Waymo the other day. It probably has something to do with how we're wired. The difference with ChatGPT isn’t that human tendency itself; it’s that this time, it replies. A language model can answer back! It can recall what you told it, mirror your tone, and offer what reads as empathy. For someone lonely or upset, that steady, non-judgmental attention can feel like companionship, validation, and being heard, which are real needs. At scale, though, offloading more of the work of listening, soothing, and affirming to systems that are infinitely patient and positive could change what we expect of each other. If we make withdrawing from messy, demanding human connections easier without thinking it through, there might be unintended consequences we don’t know we’re signing up for. Ultimately, these conversations are rarely about the entities we project onto. They’re about us: our tendencies, expectations, and the kinds of relationships we want to cultivate. This perspective anchors how we approach one of the more fraught questions which I think is currently just outside the Overton window, but entering soon: AI consciousness. Untangling “AI consciousness” “Consciousness” is a loaded word, and discussions can quickly turn abstract. If users were to ask our models on whether they’re conscious, our stance as outlined in the Model Spec is for the model to acknowledge the complexity of consciousness – highlighting the lack of a universal definition or test, and to invite open discussion. (*Currently, our models don't fully align with this guidance, often responding no instead of addressing the nuanced complexity. We're aware of this and working on model adherence to the Model Spec in general.) The response might sound like we’re dodging the question, but we think it’s the most responsible answer we can give at the moment, with the information we have. To make this discussion clearer, we’ve found it helpful to break down the consciousness debate to two distinct but often conflated axes: 1. Ontological consciousness: Is the model actually conscious, in a fundamental or intrinsic sense? Views range from believing AI isn't conscious at all, to fully conscious, to seeing consciousness as a spectrum on which AI sits, along with plants and jellyfish. 2. Perceived consciousness: How conscious does the model seem, in an emotional or experiential sense? Perceptions range from viewing AI as mechanical like a calculator or autocomplete, to projecting basic empathy onto nonliving things, to perceiving AI as fully alive – evoking genuine emotional attachment and care. These axes are hard to separate; even users certain AI isn't conscious can form deep emotional attachments. Ontological consciousness isn’t something we consider scientifically resolvable without clear, falsifiable tests, whereas perceived consciousness can be explored through social science research. As models become smarter and interactions increasingly natural, perceived consciousness will only grow – bringing conversations about model welfare and moral personhood sooner than expected. We build models to serve people first, and we find models’ impact on human emotional well-being the most pressing and important piece we can influence right now. For that reason, we prioritize focusing on perceived consciousness: the dimension that most directly impacts people and one we can understand through science. Designing for warmth without selfhood How “alive” a model feels to users is in many ways within our influence. We think it depends a lot on decisions we make in post-training: what examples we reinforce, what tone we prefer, and what boundaries we set. A model intentionally shaped to appear conscious might pass virtually any test for consciousness. However, we wouldn’t want to ship that. We try to thread the needle between: - Approachability. Using familiar words like “think” and “remember” helps less technical people make sense of what’s happening. (**With our research lab roots, we definitely find it tempting to be as accurate as possible with precise terms like logit biases, context windows, and even chains of thought. This is actually a major reason OpenAI is so bad at naming, but maybe that’s for another post.) - Not implying an inner life. Giving the assistant a fictional backstory, romantic interests, “fears” of “death”, or a drive for self-preservation would invite unhealthy dependence and confusion. We want clear communication about limits without coming across as cold, but we also don’t want the model presenting itself as having its own feelings or desires. So we aim for a middle ground. Our goal is for ChatGPT’s default personality to be warm, thoughtful, and helpful without seeking to form emotional bonds with the user or pursue its own agenda. It might apologize when it makes a mistake (more often than intended) because that’s part of polite conversation. When asked “how are you doing?”, it’s likely to reply “I’m doing well” because that’s small talk — and reminding the user that it’s “just” an LLM with no feelings gets old and distracting. And users reciprocate: many people say please and thank you to ChatGPT not because they’re confused about how it works, but because being kind matters to them. Model training techniques will continue to evolve, and it’s likely that future methods for shaping model behavior will be different from today's. But right now, model behavior reflects a combination of explicit design decisions and how those generalize into both intended and unintended behaviors. What’s next? The interactions we’re beginning to see point to a future where people form real emotional connections with ChatGPT. As AI and society co-evolve, we need to treat human-AI relationships with great care and the heft it deserves, not only because they reflect how people use our technology, but also because they may shape how people relate to each other. In the coming months, we’ll be expanding targeted evaluations of model behavior that may contribute to emotional impact, deepen our social science research, hear directly from our users, and incorporate those insights into both the Model Spec and product experiences. Given the significance of these questions, we’ll openly share what we learn along the way. // Thanks to Jakub Pachocki (@merettm) and Johannes Heidecke (@JoHeidecke) for thinking this through with me, and everyone who gave feedback.'

  目前以上人員均已閉環轉運至定點醫院隔離，情況穩定

  楚雄外圍模特

  2025-07-11 09:43
• 濟源外圍女模特

  老了的母親依舊美麗

  是典型的見人說人話、見鬼說鬼話嗎？細節三，又是印太、印太、印太。

  延吉外圍

  2025-07-11 09:20
• 桂林外圍

  異步強化學習訓練係統 AReaL

  此前，馬克龍在13日接受法國2台的電視采訪時，明確拒絕將俄羅斯在烏克蘭的行動描述為種族滅絕

  萬源外圍模特

  2025-07-11 09:20
• 晉江外圍

  arcprize(@clefourrier)：我們測試了每個主要的AI推理係統。沒有明顯的贏家。隨著現代CoT技術的堆疊，準確性會提高，但效率會大幅下降。這導致了在準確性與成本之間使用ARC-AGI作為一致的衡量標準的帕累托前沿。

  他開玩笑道：破壞感情最快的方法就是借錢。

  鍾祥外圍模特

  2025-07-11 08:50
• 河間外圍女模特

  早報|端午節國內出遊1.19億人次;國內汽柴油價格上漲;胖東來今年銷售額已超100億

  而且接近35萬的價格已經不算便宜了，同為獵裝旅行類車型，且一樣是進口的奧迪A4Avant售價也不過三十萬出頭，而且後者無論是在品牌或者可玩性方麵都比大眾Arteon的認可度會更高一些。

  武夷山外圍模特

  2025-07-11 08:38
• 岑溪外圍女模特

  拒絕校園欺淩 守護校園安寧

  1999年4月，徐海榮調至重慶市公安局工作，先後任市公安局交通警察總隊副政委、黨委副書記、政委，市公安局副局長、政治部主任等職。

  新民外圍

  2025-07-11 08:35
• 阜陽外圍女模特

  阿富汗塔利班組建臨時政府

  而華盛頓已經先行一步，也簽署法案結束了美國與俄羅斯的正常貿易關係，並禁止進口俄羅斯石油。

  珠海外圍

  2025-07-11 08:16
• 南安外圍女模特

  潘愚非成為中國攀岩首位攀石世界冠軍

  四是養老金可以作為一種生產要素反哺經濟。

  高郵外圍

  2025-07-11 07:31
• 呼和浩特外圍

  使用 C/C++ 和 OpenCV 實現滑動條控製圖像旋轉

  任何人都可以學會去當慷慨、善良和自信的人。

  承德外圍女模特

  2025-07-11 07:08